Site Loader
Make an appointment
130 Male Street, Brighton, Melbourne VIC 3186

Lumbar spondylolisthesis is a common musculoskeletal condition, which may be a factor in some people with lower back symptoms. As an anterior displacement of a vertebra in relation to the segment immediately below, they may be classified according to:

• Cause – type I, congenital; type II, pars interarticularis defect; type III, degenerative; type IV, traumatic; type V, pathologic; type VI, surgical.
• Degree of displacement – grade 1, 0% to 25%; grade 2, 26% to 50%; grade 3, 51% to 75%; grade 4, 76% to 100%.

Depending on the degree of anterior translation, instability and presence of other pain generators, patients may range from being asymptomatic to having radiculopathy. A spondylolisthesis is considered of little consequence if the slip is no greater than grade 2 and is stable. Once at grade 3 and beyond, radicular involvement is likely.

To gauge the degree and presence of any listhesis instability, weight-bearing imaging is required. Standing functional lumbar spine X-ray studies can readily highlight slippage grade and presence of instability. Recumbent/standing comparison MRI is another useful option in spondylolisthesis diagnosis, which has an advantage over standing X-ray in being able to image other potential soft tissue pain generators during the one MRI study.

Case Example

The value of recumbent/standing comparison MRI is highlighted in the following interesting case study:

Ms S, a 49 year old worker in child care was referred by her health care practitioner for a supine/standing comparison MRI in relation to chronic lower back pain with radiation into both thighs, left more than right. Of note, her symptoms were worst when lying supine. Supine X-ray report findings of 2 years prior were reported as normal, apart from some small osteophytes at several levels.

Key findings reported by the radiologist regarding the postural comparison MRI were:

1. L2/L3 diffuse disc bulge causing minimal right foramen stenosis. On the upright sequence, the disc bulge increases resulting in mild right and minimal left foramen stenosis.

2. L3/L4 small broad based posterior disc bulge causing mild right and minimal left foramen stenosis. On the upright sequence, the disc bulge increases resulting in increase in the bilateral foramen stenosis, more pronounced on the right.

3. L4/L5 small broad based posterior disc bulge causing mild to moderate right and moderate left foramen stenosis, on the supine sequences. On the upright sequences, there is Grade I anterolisthesis of L4 over L5. This finding was not present on the supine sequences. There is moderate right and significant left foramen stenosis, with irritation of exiting right L4 and compression of the exiting left L4 nerves seen. The right facet osteophytes contact the descending right L5 nerve. The increase in size of the disc bulge and the anterolisthesis causes mild canal stenosis.

While supine and standing x-ray would have highlighted the anterolisthesis change, only with a supine/standing MRI comparison could the other findings have been shown.

Supine - T2W midsagittal slice 0.25T MRI - Diagnosis of lumbar spine injury
Supine – T2W midsagittal slice 0.25T MRI
Standing - T2W midsagittal slice 0.25T MRI - Diagnosis of lumbar spine injury
Standing – T2W midsagittal slice 0.25T MRI

To view this study in our online image viewer, click here. (Images may take awhile to download, depending on your internet download speed.)

If we can be of assistance with lumbar spine imaging, contact us on 03 9592 3319.

As part of Brighton Radiology, an independent QIP Accredited Diagnostic Imaging Service, low dose CT, long view X-ray, multislice orthopaedic tomosynthesis (hybrid X-ray/CT) and general X-ray are also available.

Note: Image appearance is strongly influenced by computer monitor resolution; regular office computer monitors have lower resolution than the high-end monitors used by radiologists and in radiology centres.

This is general health information designed for educational purposes only. It does not constitute individual health advice and should not replace thorough consultation with a registered health care practitioner.

Post Author: admin@BSMRI

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *